Illinois bill: Employers should not be responsible for commuter accidents
Sometimes people in Chicago are unable to find work in their own community. This requires them to seek work elsewhere and often this means a long-distance commute. If the employee is in an accident during that drive, it can be difficult to determine whether they should be approved for workers’ compensation benefits. Proposed amendment Sen. […]
Sometimes people in Chicago are unable to find work in their own community. This requires them to seek work elsewhere and often this means a long-distance commute. If the employee is in an accident during that drive, it can be difficult to determine whether they should be approved for workers’ compensation benefits.
Proposed amendment
Sen. Kyle McCarter recently introduced a new bill that would amend the Workers’ Compensation Act in Illinois. The bill seeks to prevent employees from receiving workers’ compensation benefits when they are injured in an accident, while on the way to work.
The proposed legislation states: An employee who is required to travel in connection with his or her employment and who suffers an injury while in travel status shall be eligible for benefits only if the injury arises out of and in the course of employment while he or she is actively engaged in the duties of employment.
This means employees will need to show that the company reimbursed them for one of the following:
Lodging
Gas
Costs of travel
Oil
Furthermore, injured employees will have to prove that the travel was related to their job responsibilities or was required by the employer. For instance, if an employee is asked to run an errand for the employer before coming into work, that employee would qualify under the proposed amendment. Long-distance commutes, although necessary for the employee, would not be considered employer-related.
Differing opinions
The new legislation is based on a recent ruling by the Illinois Supreme Court. The high court ruled that a man was not a traveling employee when his injury occurred. The man took a temporary job 200 miles from his home. He decided to stay at a motel located closer to the place of employment. During a morning commute the man suffered serious injury when he was involved in a car accident.
He filed for workers’ compensation benefits and was awarded them by the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission. The commission decided the injury qualified for benefits under the current law. The company disagreed, filed an appeal and won. One state Supreme Court justice dissented from the other five, stating that the man’s temporary status qualified him as a traveling employee.
Definition changes
In addition to addressing commuting accidents, the new bill includes a definition for the words “accident” and “injury.” An accident would be an event connected to employment-related risks, employment hours, employment-related circumstances and employment-related locations.
The term, injury, would be redefined as an employment-related condition requiring medical care, or an impairment. Diseases or conditions without a proven cause would not be considered eligible for compensation. Furthermore, employees would need to prove that their injury did not come from a possible external source.
After completing law school Donald became an assistant Attorney General for 7 years and was assigned to the Industrial Commission Division. During that time he spent evenings establishing his own firm. Donald became a founding partner of a large workers’ compensation/personal injury firm but decided to leave the firm in 1990 to start a smaller “boutique” firm with the belief that bigger isn’t always better!
Related Posts
13 Sep, 2016
Turbulence Causes a Wave of Injuries for Flight AttendantsRecent reports reveal that severe turbulence has been responsible for a wave of injuries involving flight attendants in the past few years. Although numerous passengers have become severely injured as well, flight attendants are at a much higher risk of suffering significant, turbulence-related injuries that result in medical treatment, lost time from work, disability, and even death.
12 Sep, 2016
The Rate of Workplace Injuries Continues to DeclineThe United States Bureau of Labor Statistics recently reported that the rate of employer-reported occupational injuries and illness continued to decline in 2015. According to the report, there were about 2.9 million workplace injuries and illnesses reported by private sector employers -- down approximately 48,000 from 2014. With about three reported cases per 100 workers, the rate was lower than it had been since 2002. Aside from 2012, the pattern of decline has been steady for the past 13 years. According to Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA David Michaels, however, the numbers are still too high.
20 Jun, 2016
Workplace Safety: Preventing FallsFalls account for a significant portion of workplace injuries. They occur in office buildings, retail stores, warehouses, in hospitals and on construction sites. No occupation is immune or safe from falls.
Falls cover a diverse range of injuries including slips, trips, and drops from several stories. Most falls are nonfatal and not serious but, especially in construction, they constitute a significant portion of overall worker accidents. As a result, enormous energy, money and time are spent to curb the number of falls American workers experience.